<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bootvis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ryantadams.com/2007/12/10/bootvis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ryantadams.com/2007/12/10/bootvis/</link>
	<description>Technology Advice by Ryan Taylor Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 23:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Adams</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryantadams.com/2007/12/10/bootvis/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryantadams.com/2007/12/10/bootvis/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-358&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ronnie Guthrie&lt;/a&gt;:  I&#039;ve read that Microsoft article before and find it interesting. The article basically says that Bootvis was not designed to increase performance, as its &quot;optimize&quot; function is already done routinely by Windows XP. 
There are plenty of people out there who will swear Bootvis did improve their boot times, and I personally can also attest to a performance increase.
Obviously, with any program/tool it is best to do your own research. From my experience, Bootvis has helped and there is little danger in trying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<!--INFOLINKS_ON--></p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-358" rel="nofollow">Ronnie Guthrie</a>:  I&#8217;ve read that Microsoft article before and find it interesting. The article basically says that Bootvis was not designed to increase performance, as its &#8220;optimize&#8221; function is already done routinely by Windows XP.<br />
There are plenty of people out there who will swear Bootvis did improve their boot times, and I personally can also attest to a performance increase.<br />
Obviously, with any program/tool it is best to do your own research. From my experience, Bootvis has helped and there is little danger in trying it.<br />
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--><br />
<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Guthrie</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryantadams.com/2007/12/10/bootvis/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Guthrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryantadams.com/2007/12/10/bootvis/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>The bootvis tool was removed from the Microsoft servers for a reason...

&quot;The boot optimization routines invoked by Bootvis.exe are built into Windows XP&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<!--INFOLINKS_ON--></p>
<p>The bootvis tool was removed from the Microsoft servers for a reason&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The boot optimization routines invoked by Bootvis.exe are built into Windows XP&#8221;<br />
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--><br />
<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

